I design for the moment a person has to decide whether to
believe a machine — and I think that decision
should never be a leap of faith.
Most of my work lives where the stakes are real: intelligence, defence, government accountability. In those rooms an AI answer isn't useful unless the person can see why it's there — the evidence behind it, how confident the system is, and what it's unsure about.
So I design the seams, not just the surface. Confidence scores, source traceability, layered disclosure, human-in-the-loop checkpoints. The aim is never to replace expertise; it's to give experts a faster, clearer way to apply it.
I work end-to-end — research and journey mapping through to high-fidelity UI in the GOV.UK and Carbon design systems. I'm freshly back from seven months in South America and looking for the next hard problem worth solving.